Demotivation.us reminds: All information found on Demotivation.us is a legal property of Demotivation.us and can not be copied or by any other means duplicated.
"division and multiplication are the same level operations" thats not the question thats mandatory here.
As I said, 2(2+1) is not a mathematical correct expression. So theres space how to interpret this. The correct expression would be 2*(2+1), without the multiplication sign its only a common used simplification. So the calculator has to choose how the user meant it. If the user had used the correct expression both would be correct....
99% of the people wouldnt care about this, engineer disease :-) (me included)
TI inteprets this as 6/2*(2+1) and Casio as 6/(2*(2+1)) I think Casio is right beacause the user didnt acciedentally missed the * so the 2(2+1) is to see as one term like (2*(2+1).
Comments 10
As I said, 2(2+1) is not a mathematical correct expression. So theres space how to interpret this. The correct expression would be 2*(2+1), without the multiplication sign its only a common used simplification. So the calculator has to choose how the user meant it. If the user had used the correct expression both would be correct....
99% of the people wouldnt care about this, engineer disease :-) (me included)
division and multiplication are the same level operations, so it goes as TI interpreted.
or if you had an F in math - then it's 1. ;)